News and analysis
Separate the reported event, background context, quoted evidence and the writer's interpretation.
MindMap AI
Condense an article into its thesis, arguments and conclusions as a visual mind map.
An article summary should preserve the author's line of reasoning, not merely shorten every paragraph. The article summarizer looks for the central claim, major sections, supporting arguments and conclusion, then presents them as connected branches in a mind map.
This structure is useful when you need to understand what an article is saying, how it supports its position and which points deserve verification. Paste the article text directly; the tool does not fetch a web page or bypass a publisher's access controls.
Separate the reported event, background context, quoted evidence and the writer's interpretation.
Identify the main position, reasons offered in support and assumptions that may need closer examination.
Map the question, method, important findings and caveats described for a general audience.
Follow how themes develop across sections without losing the relationship between examples and conclusions.
The central node states the article's subject. First-level branches normally represent its principal claims or sections, while lower levels capture explanations, evidence, examples and conclusions associated with those claims.
The map is an orientation tool, not a substitute for quotations or citations. It helps you find the relevant part of the original article quickly when you need exact wording or source evidence.
Move from a long article to an editable visual outline.
Paste the text you want to understand and organize.
AI identifies the main ideas and their relationships.
Review, refine and export the generated visual summary.
See topics and supporting ideas instead of a single paragraph.
The generated structure is checked against the supplied text.
Continue refining the summary in the mind map editor.
Include the introduction and conclusion when possible, since these often state the purpose and final position most clearly.
Exclude menus, cookie notices, recommended links and comments so they are not mistaken for part of the article.
Section headings and phrases such as who said what help preserve the article's organization and source boundaries.
Return to the article before quoting, citing or relying on a statistic; a summary can compress important qualifications.
The tool cannot determine whether an article is accurate, balanced or trustworthy simply by summarizing it. It may also underrepresent tone, rhetorical choices, counterarguments or small details that matter to a careful reading.
Use the map to navigate the article, then consult the original author, publication date, linked evidence and citations before using its claims in academic or professional work.
You can submit up to 40,000 characters at a time.
The result is an editable mind map with topics, subtopics and source-backed details.
Yes. After generation, you can continue editing and exporting the mind map.
Not directly. Paste the article's readable text into the input area. This avoids fetching unrelated page elements and does not attempt to bypass logins, subscriptions or publisher restrictions.
Important attributed points may appear, but the generated map is not a citation manager and should not be treated as an exact quotation record. Verify wording and citation details in the original article.
The article mode is designed to organize the central position, supporting arguments and conclusion when they are present in the text. Implicit or ambiguous arguments still require human interpretation.
It can help with initial orientation and review, but students and researchers should still read the source, evaluate its evidence and follow the required citation rules for their institution.